🔗 Share this article

Following a significant legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that prevented viewers in Australia from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Ban

After the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator applied to the classification board to officially classify the available footage. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that empowered the commissioner to order social media companies to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or offensive, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The majority of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. As a result, the board revised the classification of the videos to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the board held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as that footage was released years after the event, "once emotions around the matter had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to defend free speech and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. We remain committed to safeguarding these principles."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the board's decision, but pointed out that the revised classification now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply sensitive content labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in line with their own content policies.