🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, however, may align so closely with the mythologized version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from chaos. While he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The presidency was effectively a selection process with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the events stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier version prompted Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it might seek to question.